Circumcision is Not Physical?

I have the greatest job in the world.  This past weekend I had the opportunity to stand shoulder to shoulder with 35 youth as they confirmed their faith, reaffirmed their baptisms, and committed to follow Christ.  As part of confirmation weekend I had the opportunity to give a message on Romans 3:1-8, circumcision of the heart.  Below is the transcript along with an audio file.

Listen here:

2013 ConfirmationMay 4-5, 2013 – Confirmation Weekend

Romans 3:1-8

When I was informed about this week’s scripture, and sat down with Jason to discuss the text a question was raised.  “What does Paul mean circumcision is not physical?”  Jason, being ever appropriate and full of couth responded by say, “we have 15 boys in our confirmation class this year, I think that they, you, and I would agree that circumcision is about as physical as it gets!”

In the fall of 2011, when I first arrived on campus at Wesley Theological Seminary, I was forced to enter into a covenant.  As part of a class titled Spiritual Formation for the Practice of Ministry, a class I cynically referred to as my 3 hour weekly waste of time in D.C., I entered into a covenant with six other first year seminary students.  I could not have made up the makeup of this group.  There was Chris, an Army computer analyst who pushed back at everything our professor said, Okey an Air Force Chaplain candidate who was glued to his phone, Sharon the director of religion and faith programs at the Human Rights Campaign, Melvin a licensed local pastor from Baltimore who was more opinionated than Jason and more longwinded than Steve Larkin, Monica a stay at home mom who really needed to cut back on her caffeine intake, Terah whose definition of a bad grade was an A-, and me the State Department contractor who was just there to get his class credit and move on (and didn’t mind an A-).

These were people that I would have never hung out with outside of class.  But here we were, assigned to the same group for the rest of the year.  We covenanted to pray for one another, serve the community with one another, and help carry one another through our first year in seminary.  The “touchy-feely” side of me, which is not as large or developed as many of you might think, thought “awww… it will be so nice to have a group of partners that will walk this journey with me”.  The cynical side of me thought “oh great, here goes 3 hours every week that I won’t get back”.

Covenants are part of our Methodist heritage.  John Wesley encouraged members of the early Methodist movement to meet regularly in Methodist Class Meetings.  They would confess their sins to one another, pray together, and be healed together.  This is where the early leaders of the Methodist movement were nurtured and equipped.

The Old and New Testaments are a collection of covenant stories.  In these stories we learn of leaders within Israel who were nurtured and equipped by God for the call God was placing upon them.  The Abrahamic covenant promised land, descendants, and prosperity.  Exodus 19.5 tells us that if the Israelites could “obey” God’s voice, and keep God’s covenant, then they would be God’s “treasured possession out of all the peoples”.  The Davidic covenant established David’s house, David’s throne, and a kingdom.   And then there is the new covenant which was established a new relationship between God and humans, which was mediated by Jesus.  This new covenant was different.  This new covenant was not limited only to the nation of Israel.  Jews and Gentiles would now be blessed and protected through the new covenant.  From front to back the Bible is a covenant.  And that is where our scripture reading brings us.

“Then what advantage has the Jew?  What is the value of circumcision?” 

These questions are precisely what Paul wants to get to the bottom of.  And for us reading the text today through our twenty-first century Christian lenses we assume the answer will be “none”.  There is no advantage.

Circumcision was not about getting in or staying in God’s favor.

Circumcision was meant to identify those who were already in.  If circumcision was meant to separate Israel from the rest of the nations, a physical mark of their covenant with God, where does this fit into the new covenant established through Christ?  Paul does not side-step his question about the advantage the Jews have over the Gentiles.  In verse two he addresses the question head on.  Israel had been entrusted by God with the “oracles of God”, aka the Scriptures.  These oracles had been written down long ago, by the generations of Abraham, Moses, and David, for the use of future generations.  And who comprises the future generations: Paul and the Gentile church.  As N.T. Wright, the Bishop of Durham puts it, “The covenant was there to put to rights, to deal with evil and restore God’s justice and order the cosmos”.

Since September 9th our confirmands have been in covenant with one another and with you, I bet most of you here did not know that we as a congregation entered into that covenant.  By joining our confirmation class they covenanted to attend and actively participate in worship, attend weekly lessons (missing no more than 3), and attend an end of the year retreat.  That was their end of the covenant.  And in exchange our teachers (Sarah Lynn, Haley, and Patty) along with our high school mentors agreed to teach them and share the oracles of God with them.

As a congregation we covenanted to help them by teaching them the faith.  That’s why Jay Steadman did not mind a group of loud 6th, 7th, and 8th graders interrupting a Sunday school lesson he was trying to teach.  That’s why when this group would approach you in between services, while you were grabbing a cup of coffee, and barraged you with what might have seemed like hard or personal questions about your own relationship with God, you cheerfully answered them.  That was our end of the deal in the covenant with our confirmands.

Israel had been entrusted by God, through covenants that guaranteed prosperity and protection, to share the oracles of God with future generations.  What really had transpired in the gap between generations?  Was Israel faithful?  Israel was called to be a faithful servant of God, to obey God’s laws, to be a light to the nations.  That was the purpose of the Torah!  The Torah was intended to enable Israel with the ability to preserve the oracles of God and be a light to the nations.  However, over time and generations the Torah took the place of the oracles.

For some, it became more important or simply easier to fulfill the requirements of Torah law rather than keeping and preserving the oracles which had been entrusted to Israel.  For some it was easier to keep the outwards appearance of their faith.  But Israel had been unfaithful, and Paul knew this better than anyone else.

Our confirmands can tell you why Paul would know this just as well, if not better than anyone else.  Before Paul was Paul, he was Saul.  Saul was a Jewish Pharisee who painstakingly persecuted the early church.  Through these persecutions Paul was in fact violating many of the oracles and laws he, as Jew, had been chosen to preserve.  Israel had been charged by God to not only save these stories for future generations, but was also charged to be an example of how to live for future generations.  What Paul is saying here is that Israel had in fact been unfaithful.  And Paul does not mean that Israel had lost its faith in God or simply became a band of unbelievers.  Israel had been unfaithful to God’s commission.  Paul even goes so far as to use Israel’s own stories to explain their unfaithfulness.

In chapter three of his letter to the Romans, Paul was not writing down new ideas, he was simply uses what David had written in Psalm 51.  This is the same theme that is scattered through second Samuel chapters eleven and twelve. Paul quotes the Psalm and points to what vindication Israel could have rightly suffered as a sinful nation.  No reader of this letter, who was familiar with the psalter would fail to miss the unquoted verses within the theme of Romans 3.  There is no escaping God’s righteousness.  David knew that and so did the reader of this letter.

A covenant relationship only works if both parties enter into the agreement knowing they are in it for the long-haul.  This is one of the premises of marriage.  Believe it or not Allison did not marry me because I am the perfect example of what a husband should be.  We do not marry our spouse and become partners with them because we know they are without flaw or are perfect.  The covenant group I was forced into joined during my first week’s at Wesley did not kick me out of the group if I did not meet the prescribed agreement among us.  If one of our confirmand was unable to meet a requirement of our confirmation class, or began show signs of disinterest Sarah Lynn, Haley, and Patty would not kick them out of the class and banish them from the group.  These punishments might seem justified or appropriate to some but that is not the point of entering into a covenant relationship.

When we read the stories of the Old and New Testament and see Israel’s unfaithfulness to God’s commission, it would be easy for us to assume that Israel would receive a just punishment.  That God would judge Israel as nation, because the covenant was built upon a nation and not individuals, and condemn the nation for their unfaithfulness.  But you see, that’s not how grace works.  And what God does is open this covenant to all: Jews AND Gentiles.

This new covenant, opened and available to all people, is about the way in which God addresses our unfaithfulness through the cross and the resurrection of Jesus.  After all, this what what the covenant was intended to do in the first place.  Our unfaithfulness, our rejection of the covenant does not separate us from God.  My sins, your sins do not keep us away from God.

This covenant with God did not mean that the early church, the first Christians (those people who met Christ on the road to Damascus and broke bread with him) did not doubt.  A covenant with God does mean that we are certain in our beliefs, have no doubts, know everything there is to know about the Bible.  This covenant does not require us to know everything about being kind or virtuous.  It’s not about us at all!  What it is about is us playing an active role in what God is doing in the world.

This is what Paul is getting at when he says that true circumcision is not “something external or physical”.  In the last verse of chapter two, Paul says, “a person is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart – it is spiritual and NOT literal”.  This means that we can have all of the outward signs that we want of our faith.  It does not matter how many “Jesus fish” you have on the back of your minivan. You can wear a cross around our neck, show up to church every Sunday without fail, or even participate in a small group; but if we have not opened our hearts to be marked by the Holy Spirit then it’s all for nothing.

Last weekend I had the chance to go on a retreat, to go camping with our confirmation class.  We braved rustic cabins, spiders, no cell phone service, technology glitches and weird howls in the night to open ourselves up to be marked by God.  We opened our hearts to the opportunity to have the Holy Spirit work through us.  We gathered to learn what it means to grow, give, serve, and share as a follower of Jesus.  We learned that it is through growing, giving, serving and sharing that our hearts are circumcised by God.

On Sunday morning, just as we were getting ready to leave and head back home to the soccer and lacrosse games that were scheduled I told our confirmands that if they were unwilling to do so, unwilling to allow God to work through them and their confirmation vows, then it would all be for nothing.

If our confirmands were there to simply check off a box, never again seeking out what the oracles of God will speak to them, never again to doubt or wrestle with God, or to never open themselves up to have God write on their hearts again, then their time in confirmation, this entire year would have been for nothing.  Because it is when our hearts are marked by the Holy Spirit that we cannot be separated from God, even through our doubt, questions, unfaithfulness and sin.  It is when our hearts are circumcised by our faith, our faith in Jesus Christ, that we are made one with God.  It’s not an outward symbol.  It’s not physical.   And it is what keeps us connected with God through our unfaithfulness.

Midrash – John 10:22-30

מדרש - John 10:22-30

“If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly.” – The Jews could not identify Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God, the Christ.  They mocked him, challenged him, and questioned him.  They were unable to identify Jesus for who he was.  They only recognized him within the context of their own experiences and what they had been taught by their religious leaders.  Jesus responds to their inquiry by explaining that the works, works some did not recognize, he has done give testimony to who he is, the Messiah.  Jesus explains that his followers will be saved through himself and the Father.

This is the same question, or demand, that many of us make on Jesus today.  We want tangible proof that we can experience through all of our senses.  We want to hear, see, and feel Jesus.  We try to place the identification of Christ through the own contexts of our experiences, through what we have been taught, similar to what is illustrated in John’s Gospel.  But what if the proof we are looking for is much more simple that we want to expect.  What if the Messiah we are expecting is performing the same works in our world that He performed 2000 years ago?  Are we able to step back and see Christ in the stranger on the street or through a classmate?  The labels we want to place on Christ are the same labels that prevent us from being able to identify our friends, acquaintances, and family for who they really are.

Tell us plainly Jesus.  Perhaps Jesus has, is, and will continue to.  Perhaps we are the ones in our own way from seeing who Jesus is and how Jesus is at work in our lives.

Jackie Robinson Day

Yesterday was Jackie Robinson Day throughout Major League Baseball.  66 years ago yesterday, Jackie Robinson broke through the established race barriers and made his debut with the Brooklyn Dodgers.  Robinson’s notability within professional sports is not limited to the fact that he broke long-standing color barriers within MLB.  His career stats set him apart as well from players of his generation: 1947 ROY, .311 career BA, NL 1949 NL MVP, and 6 All-Star Game appearances.

His jersey number, 42, was the first number to be retired throughout MLB.  The only active player to still wear the number is Yankees closer Mariano Rivera.  When Rivera retires the number will no longer be used by any active MLB player.

Apart from Robinson’s accomplishments on the field, he also has a little known connection with the United Methodist Church.  In 1958 Robinson appeared in a television program produced by the UMC.  According to archivists it is unsure if Robinson had an official affiliation with the denomination.

The 1962 Hall of Fame inductee moderated the program.

Robinson, then an executive at the Chock Full o’ Nuts company, is not prominent in the 1958 program, Anderson pointed out, but simply introduces the morality play and moderates a panel of four respondents. “His total time on the tape may not be more than two or three minutes”.

You can check out the article on the UMC website here or watch a portion of the program below.

Holy Thursday & First Communion

The Last Supper by Sadao Watanabe

Last night I observed Holy Thursday by having dinner with nine members of our church. The menu consisted of the most amazing Italian food I have ever eaten. The best part was that aspects of a traditional passover meal were tied into the meal. The evening opened with the a reading from Luke followed by a prayer. Throughout the dinner conversation we discussed aspects of lives where Jesus has met us and thus changed our lives.  It was the most meaningful observance of Holy Thursday that I have been a part of.

The topic of first communion came up and I got to think that I do not remember when or where I first participated in the sacrament of holy communion. I remember my confirmation and remember communion during confirmation but I know that before that I had taken communion but cannot pin a date or place on the first time. Catholics celebrate their first communion often with ceremony and parties thrown by family. There are websites dedicated to gifts you can purchase to commemorate the event. I do not remember a party, or gifts, or even cake. My wife remembers her first time taking communion at the age of 10.

Communion, the Lord’s Supper, or the Eucharist is something that has been discussed and argued over by theologians for centuries and continues to be a hot topic issue for Christianity today. Issues over transubstantiation, the elements, and authorization to provide over the sacrament created divides within the church and is something that is still debated by theologians today.

So, do you remember your first communion or are you like me and have no clue about the details?

Easter Sunday – How Not To

Easter Sunday will be here before we know it and with Easter comes invitations to friends and neighbors to join you and your congregation for a sunrise service, coffee time, and even a service with special music.

Crossbridge Church in Sugar Land, TX has created a quick how-to, rather a how-not-to video to help folks navigate inviting their friends and neighbors to an Easter service.  I thought it was clever and funny.

[vimeo http://www.vimeo.com/62650362 w=500&h=281]

How Not To Invite Someone to Easter… from Crossbridge Church on Vimeo.

So there you have it.  No creepy doorstep conversations or even creepier bunny suits.  So I hope that you find a welcoming place to worship this Easter Sunday.

A New Take On Palm Sunday

This past Sunday was Palm Sunday.  This was the first Palm Sunday that I was not in a traditional worship setting, waving palms in the air as  Hosannas were sung.  I was in Goshen, Virginia wrapping up a weekend middle school retreat.  So missed the usual pomp and circumstance of the Sunday before Easter.

This is not just symbolic but emblematic of our watered-down, imperial, and impotent brand of christianity.

Middle Finger

But is our celebration of Palm Sunday a real reflection of what actually went down on the day Jesus rod down the street on a colt while palms were being thrown on the ground?  Bo Sanders of Homebrewed Christianity wrote an excellent post comparing the actual events of Jesus entering Jerusalem to a call for revolution.

According to Bo, the laying of palms on the ground before Jesus that day in Jerusalem is the equivalent of throwing up your middle finger at the established government (there’s a Sunday school lesson for your kids).

Here is what Bo had to say:

I am troubled by the lack of context regarding the palms of Palm Sunday. It reeks of both willful ignorance and religious disconnect.

In so many ways we have sanitized, sterilized and compartmentalized the teaching of scriptures. We proudly and loudly defend the Bible – all the while neglecting the actual reality talked about in that Bible.

We complain that Christmas and Easter have been commercialized and secularized all the while partaking of the consumerism and cultural complacency that those two celebrations are meant to challenge!

Palm Sunday might be the most flagrant example of this ignorance and misappropriation. Palm Sunday is call for revolution against the powers of oppression, the systems and institutions that occupy foreign lands and repress its citizens with unjust practices and economic policies.

You can read more of this post from Bo at Homebrew Christianity.

Journal Entry – A New Kind of Christian

New Kind of ChristianSpiritual practices, secret or shared?  This is the title of the 13th chapter of Brian McLaren’s book, A New Kind of Christian.  This question has bugged me since I began the process of acknowledging and answering my call to ministry. Spiritual practices, are they a public display of faith or are they private?  I took the middle-ground on the question and found a “happy medium” and thought that I had solved the question.  A few years later,  while working with our church’s high school catechism class, this question resurfaced in my life, and here it is again.  I guess this means that if the question keeps resurfacing then I have not answered it or have not done so adequately.

The question arises in McLaren’s book through an email dialogue between Dan and his “spiritual-Yoda”, Neo.  The question about prayer and studying of the Bible, when measured by quantity vs. quality, that is the amount of time your devote to the spiritual practice rather than ensuring that the time spent is meaningful, is raised.  This is the same question that I was thinking about three years ago while sitting in a hotel outside the Mall of American in Minneapolis, MN.

It was a frigid winter evening, I guess that’s typical in Minnesota, and I had just started my first year in seminary.  I had no idea what I had gotten myself into, and on top of that I was not prepared with the spiritual practices that would be necessary for the journey that was before me.  There is no handbook given to seminary students or new Christians (other than the Bible).  I felt like Ricky Bobby in Talladega Nights during his first ESPN interview.  I knew what to do with my hands, but was not sure how to do everything else.

Neo and Dan come to the conclusion that the modern-day idea of consumerism and individualism has driven us (a collective us) to more public forms of worship.  Dan describes feeling uncomfortable with the lyrics of many of the more popular contemporary Christian music -

“it’s all about ‘me’.  How Jesus makes me feel, what he does for me, how he loves and forgives me.  The language is almost erotic he holds me close, embraces me, and so on…nothing wrong with this, but I wonder – does this represent a kind of narcissistic and over individualized spirituality?”

Dan and Neo would argue that as Christianity moves out of the modern era spiritual practices will become more private again.  I do not think that this reduces the practices to something you do in your own home and not share with anyone.  I think there will be a balance between what is done publicly (or shared publicly) and what is kept between the individual and God.

I am not sure if this answers the question – spiritual practices, secret or shared? – or if more questions are now raised.  But maybe that is a good thing.  Perhaps that will just require me (or us) to seek God more, with more intentionality.

Church Websites

Over the past three weeks I have been meeting on Thursday evenings with a group of people who are prayerfully considering planting a satellite congregation in the Ft. Belvoir/Lorton, VA area. I am working on a team that is looking at the communication needs of a new congregation: web presence, email, social-media, marketing, branding, etc. Personally I have been examining the practices of congregations who are utilizing social media to introduce themselves to the community and communicate effectively with their members. In addition, I am researching website options for a multi-site congregation.

So now I have questions:

How does your church utilize social media in communicating with members and the community?

What are the best practices of churches who utilize their websites to introduce their congregations to the community?

In a multi-site congregation, does each campus have a separate site or are they combined with shared information?

Journal Entry – The Great Emergence

the-great-emergenceThis week’s installment of the Emergent Gathering brings us to Phyllis Tickle and The Great Emergence.  The beginning of this book reminds me a lot of her newer work Emergence Christianity.  In the first part of this book examines the great rummage sale that is currently happening, along with the rummage sales that occurred during the Reformation, Great Schism, and during Gregory the Great’s time in power.

In each of these “great” rummage sales, the “great” adjective has been added to “insulate itself into popular discussions”.  That is to say that the adjective places the event into the historical spotlight.  Tickle argues that the addition of the label “great” applies to “The Great Reformation”, the “Great Schism”, and Gregory “the Great”.  It is important to remember that even though today as we read about these events through the lens of twenty-first century lives, the events that unfolded shaped the way in which we experience the Gospel and the emergence which is occurring right now will shape future generations of Christians.  Even though these rummage sales seem to have upset the status quo of Christianity these events shaped the future of the church along with insulating the faith during upheavals in sociopolitical events (ex. Monasticism emerging during the late-fifth century).

Tickle shared that three things happen during these upheavals within Christianity: a stronger form of Christianity emerges, the more dominant expression of Christianity is simplified, and the Gospel itself is spread to new geographic and demographic audiences. Tickle referred to the five hundred year upheavals as “rummage sales”.

Here are some questions that were raised as a result of this reading:

  1. What is it?  Where is it going?  Do we really want to be along for the ride? – Adopted from Phyllis’s opening questions.
  2. According to Tickle, the Great Emergence is happening within Christianity and else where in our lives, is this an accurate statement?   Where is the Great Emergence taking us?
  3. If it truly is a rummage sale, what aspects of Christianity do we keep and which aspects do toss into the bargain bin?
  4. Just as Gregory the Great and the Monastics saved Christianity for us today, are we saving Christianity for future generations or are we going to be seen as “messing things up”?

What Would Jesus Brew?

If you know me then you know I am nut when if comes to craft beer.  I like to think that I jumped on the craft beer bandwagon when it was first getting started and before it was the latest trend.  It was my interest in craft beer that got me hooked on homebrewing my own beer.  I love beer.  I love the history of beer, the process and time it takes to make beer, and I love trying new beers.

My grandmother, aka Ahmama, knows that I love beer so much that whenever she sees a news article (in one of the 12 newspapers she gets daily) or an internet (yes, my Ahmama is on Facebook)article she will pass them on to me.  Like the article I got from her on Sunday morning while I was leading Tribe Time and getting elbow deep in paper-mache.  The Wall Street Journal ran an article about a churchs who are using beer, more specifically craft beer and homebrewing, as a way to reach to an ‘untapped’ community of people and share the Gospel with them.

The group’s name is ‘What Would Jesus Brew?’ or WWJB? for short.  This group gets together 5 times a year to brew, discuss scripture, and enjoy fellowship with one another.  The idea has been so successful at St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in North Carolina that they have created a local brewing competition among other churches who are following the lead of WWJB?.

“Beer provides the opportunity to tap into that deeply God-given desire to create,”

Check out the article in the WSJ and let me know if you’re interested in Virginia version on this homebrewing fellowship.